Employment Tribunal decisions and outcome patterns in the Care Work sector from the last 12 months.
Final Care Work decisions with at least one determined claim.
Proportion of cases won or split/upheld in our database.
Cases lost or struck out due to procedural/jurisdictional issues.
Showing 16 cases from the last 2 months.
Browse the latest published decisions for employers represented in this sector sample.
The claim was struck out because the claimant had less than two years' service and failed to show any applicable exception to the qualifying period.
The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to pursue it and did not comply with Tribunal directions.
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay the second claimant for work and suspension periods and failed to give both claimants proper notice pay, while dismissing the first claimant's wages claim.
The claimant succeeded on all four complaints: breach of contract for notice pay and holiday pay, redundancy payment, and unauthorised deductions from wages.
The respondent failed to pay the claimant the sums due for notice pay and holiday pay, so the claims were well founded and succeeded.
The claimant failed to prove it was not reasonably practicable to present his claim within the statutory time limit, and even if it were, he did not present it within a reasonable period thereafter, so the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction.
The Respondent failed to present a valid response, resulting in a default judgment where the Tribunal upheld the Claimant's claims for unpaid wages, bonus, consequential losses, and notice pay.
The claimant was not a disabled person as defined by the Equality Act 2010, so the claim was dismissed.
The claimant was found not to be an employee, so the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction and dismissed the claim.
The employer dismissed the claimant without any disciplinary process or appeal, which fell outside the band of reasonable responses.
All complaints were either dismissed as not well founded or withdrawn and dismissed, resulting in a complete loss for the claimant.
The claimant succeeded because the respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments, resulting in an award of £18,000 total compensation.
The claim for direct disability discrimination by association in relation to dismissal succeeded, but the claim regarding being escorted from the premises was dismissed.
The claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal were well founded because the employer's decision to dismiss for falsifying attendance records was not reasonable in the circumstances, though the claimant's conduct contributed to the dismissal.
The claimant succeeded on all complaints because the respondent made unauthorised deductions, breached contract regarding notice and holiday pay, and failed to pay the statutory redundancy entitlement.
The complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed.
Decisions are sourced from official GOV.UK Employment Tribunal publications.
Important: Summaries and statistics are automated. Always verify against the original decision documents.