Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions involving Adarma Ltd (In Administration).
£1,338 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
The claimant succeeded because the respondent failed to elect employee representatives and consult on redundancies as required by law, and also made an unauthorised deduction from wages.
Reference: 8001888/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
The respondent failed to elect employee representatives and consult as required by law before making 20+ employees redundant, so the complaint was well founded.
Reference: 8002082/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
The tribunal found the respondent had breached sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations Act by not electing representatives or consulting before the collective redundancies.
Reference: 8001800/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
The Tribunal held that the respondent failed to comply with its statutory election and consultation obligations, granting the claimant a protective award for the 90‑day protected period.
Reference: 8001865/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
The Tribunal held that the employer breached sections 188 and 188A by not electing representatives and not consulting, so the claim was upheld and a protective award for 90 days was granted.
Reference: 4102788/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.