WorkDisputes Logo

Croydon Employment Tribunal cases

Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Croydon.

Recent cases
9
Employers (last 3 months)
9
Recorded awards (last 3 months)
0

Published decisions

Cases from the last three months

Newest decisions first

8 Sept 2026
Claim struck out

Other

Employer: Medway NHS Trust

The claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to attend or be represented at the hearing, and the postponement application was refused for lack of supporting evidence and exceptional circumstances.

Legal Issues (1)
  • The key legal issues are the application of rule 47 (dismissal for failure to attend) and rule 32 (postponement on medical grounds) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure. The Tribunal considered whether there were exceptional circumstances justifying the failure to provide evidence and whether the claim should be dismissed.

Reference: 2306335/2023

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
12 Aug 2026
Claim struck out

Unfair Dismissal

Employer: Mitie Ltd and Others

The claim against the Bank of England was struck out because Mr Freeman was never employed by the Bank, but the claim against the other respondents proceeds.

Legal Issues (3)
  • Whether the Bank of England could be liable for unfair dismissal absent an employment relationship
  • strike out for no reasonable prospects
  • TUPE service provision change implications.

Reference: 6022025/2025

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
6 Aug 2026
Mixed outcome

Discrimination

Employer: Credera Ltd

The age discrimination claim was withdrawn and dismissed, but the victimisation claim survived a strike out application and will proceed to hearing.

Legal Issues (3)
  • Interpretation of protected act in victimisation claim
  • whether claim has reasonable prospects
  • application of withdrawal and strike out principles.

Reference: 6014125/2024

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
28 Jul 2026
Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination and Breach of Contract

Employer: NSL Ltd

All complaints of unfair dismissal, breach of contract, and disability discrimination were dismissed after a hearing.

Legal Issues (2)
  • The judgment does not specify legal issues
  • it simply records that all complaints failed and were dismissed.

Reference: 6007414/2024

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
27 Jul 2026
Claim dismissed

Other

Employer: Ms J Dawson and Others

The claimant was not an employee or worker because she had a genuine right to substitute, was not subject to sufficient control, and was operating her own business.

Legal Issues (5)
  • Whether the claimant was an employee or worker under s.230 ERA 1996
  • whether there was an obligation of personal service
  • whether the right to substitute was genuine
  • whether the respondents exercised control
  • whether the claimant was in business on her own account.

Reference: 2306620/2024

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
20 Jul 2026
Claim struck out

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination and Whistleblowing

Employer: Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust

All claims were struck out: the whistleblowing claims had no reasonable prospect of success due to previous findings, and the unfair dismissal and victimisation claims were struck out due to the claimant's failure to comply with orders and non-attendance at the final hearing.

Legal Issues (4)
  • Strike out for no reasonable prospect of success (whistleblowing claims)
  • strike out for failure to comply with tribunal orders and non-attendance (unfair dismissal and victimisation)
  • application of Blockbuster Entertainment Ltd v James
  • overriding objective and proportionality.

Reference: 2303596/2022

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
3 Jul 2026
Claimant won

Redundancy Pay

Employer: LDO Realisations Ltd (in Administration) formerly known as Octagon Developments Ltd (in Administration)

The employer failed to consult collectively before making 20+ employees redundant, so a protective award of 90 days was granted.

Legal Issues (4)
  • Failure to comply with section 188 TULRCA collective consultation obligations
  • protective award discretion under section 189
  • distinction between claimants with satisfactory employment evidence (Annex A) and those without (Annex B)
  • employer insolvency and role of Secretary of State.

Reference: 2300884/2025

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Pro case research

Need more cases or more precise results?

Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.

Open Pro Case Search

Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.