Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Leicester.
£15,386.98 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Asda Stores Ltd
The claim of unfair dismissal succeeded, but the award was significantly reduced due to the Claimant's contributory fault in failing to follow safety protocols.
Reference: 2600893/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Caterlink Ltd
The complaints of unlawful deduction of wages and holiday pay were presented out of time and dismissed, and the redundancy payment complaint was dismissed as made in error.
Reference: 6045825/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Roof-Maker Ltd
The Tribunal found that the dismissal was unfair because the employer failed to carry out a reasonable investigation and did not provide the Claimant with the evidence against him in advance of the disciplinary hearing, breaching procedural fairness.
Reference: 6043540/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Liss Sport Ltd
The claimant was unfairly dismissed and the respondent also failed to provide written reasons for dismissal and payslips.
Reference: 6048590/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: The Lodge Trust CIO
The Tribunal found that the Claimant did not make a protected disclosure, and that the Respondent had a genuine belief in his misconduct, conducted a reasonable investigation, and acted within the range of reasonable responses in dismissing him.
Reference: 2601634/2023 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: F and M Steed Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation) and Secretary of State for Business and Trade
The claimants' complaints under TULCRA section 189 were well-founded because the first respondent failed to comply with the consultation requirements of section 188.
Reference: 2601487/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: The Chief Constable of Leicestershire Police
The claim was struck out because the Claimant conducted proceedings unreasonably, failed to comply with Tribunal orders, and as a result, it was no longer possible to have a fair hearing.
Reference: 6001129/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Impact Ducting Sales Ltd
The claimant succeeded only on the unauthorised deductions from wages claim (holiday pay) but no financial award was ordered as the sums had already been repaid; all other claims (constructive unfair dismissal, race discrimination, harassment, and whistleblowing detriment) were dismissed.
Reference: 6002987/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.