Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Midlands East.
£106,462.44 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Amazon UK Services Ltd
The claimant was found not to be disabled under the Equality Act 2010, so the reasonable adjustments claim was dismissed.
Employer: Walter Miles Electrical Engineers Ltd
The claimant was awarded compensation of £38,498.75 after a liability finding, with the remedy judgment finalizing the award.
Employer: Fullhurst Community College
Neither claim succeeded: the unfair dismissal claim was struck out and the breach of contract claim was dismissed. Both claims are finally disposed of.
Employer: Sole House Ltd
Claim was presented 18 months out of time with no application to extend, and it was reasonably practicable to present in time, so the tribunal lacked jurisdiction and dismissed the claim.
Employer: Maximus UK Services Ltd
All claims were dismissed because they were submitted out of time and no extension was granted.
Employer: GOP Equipment Holdings LLC
The respondent failed to pay the claimant various contractual sums and wages, and did not attend the hearing to contest the claims.
Employer: K Winterburn T/a Kimi Hair and Beauty
The claims were presented after the statutory time limit had expired and the Tribunal declined to extend time as it was not just and equitable to do so.
Employer: Tesco Stores Ltd
The employer acted within the band of reasonable responses in dismissing for gross misconduct (sexualised comments about a manager) and the conduct was a repudiatory breach of contract.
Employer: Jelly Rolls Ltd (in liquidation) and Secretary of State for Business and Trade
The claimant was not an employee for the purposes of claims from the National Insurance fund, so all claims fail and are dismissed.
Employer: Unipart Group Ltd
All claims were dismissed as either not well founded on the facts or brought out of time.
Employer: Department for Work and Pensions and Ms A Walker
The Tribunal dismissed all claims because the claimant failed to establish less favourable treatment, a discriminatory provision criterion or practice, unwanted conduct related to age, or any detriment as a part-time worker, and the part-time worker claim was also out of time.
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.