Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Sheffield.
£31,212.36 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Professional Care Ltd
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay the second claimant for work and suspension periods and failed to give both claimants proper notice pay, while dismissing the first claimant's wages claim.
Reference: 1806924/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Ava Waste Management Group Ltd
The claimant succeeded on claims of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, and unauthorised deduction of wages, but failed on a disability discrimination claim.
Reference: 6027674/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Sheffield City Council
All claims of direct race discrimination, victimisation, and unauthorised deduction from wages were dismissed or withdrawn by the claimant.
Reference: 6011440/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Extraction Solutions Ltd
The Employment Tribunal found that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and dismissed it.
Reference: 6031780/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Yorkshire Rose Motorhomes Ltd (in Voluntary Liquidation)
The claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to attend the hearing and provided no explanation for her absence.
Reference: 6034825/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: EE Ltd
The claims were presented out of time, it was not just and equitable to extend the limit, and the allegations failed on their merits.
Reference: 6003170/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Jubilee Angels Ltd
The tribunal struck out the respondent's response and found that the claim for unauthorised deduction of wages succeeded.
Reference: 6040401/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Serene Residential Care Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation)
The Tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and was owed statutory redundancy, notice pay, and accrued holiday pay.
Reference: 6039452/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Woodflow Panels Ltd
The claimant was entitled to be paid for approximately 2 days of work (training and substantive tasks) carried out before the employment start date, as the respondent had requested and benefited from that work.
Reference: 1806151/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.