Discrimination
Both claims of disability discrimination were found unfounded and dismissed.
Legal Issues (2)
- Discrimination arising from disability (s.15 EqA)
- failure to make reasonable adjustments (ss.20-21 EqA).
Employment Tribunal decisions and outcome patterns in the Public Sector sector from the last 12 months.
Final Public Sector decisions with at least one determined claim.
Proportion of cases won or split/upheld in our database.
Cases lost or struck out due to procedural/jurisdictional issues.
Showing 33 cases from the last 2 months.
Browse the latest published decisions for employers represented in this sector sample.
Both claims of disability discrimination were found unfounded and dismissed.
The claimant succeeded on two reasonable adjustment claims but lost on one, and withdrew others, resulting in a split outcome.
All claims were dismissed because the Tribunal found that the respondent's actions were not discriminatory, the alleged provision, criterion or practice did not exist, the claimant was not subjected to a detriment for a protected act, and the email relied upon as a protected disclosure was not in the public interest, and the reason for dismissal was redundancy.
The claimant's claims of automatically unfair dismissal and ordinary unfair dismissal were not well-founded and were dismissed.
The claimant won on ordinary unfair dismissal due to unreasonable investigation and procedural flaws, but lost on automatic unfair dismissal because the alleged disclosures were not protected and were not the reason for dismissal.
The claims were struck out at a preliminary hearing.
The claimant's claim of constructive unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed.
Most claims struck out for unreasonable conduct and non-compliance; automatic unfair dismissal claim allowed to proceed.
Claimant's direct sex discrimination claim was dismissed because the Tribunal found the reason for non-appointment was his mother's involvement in the recruitment process, not his gender.
The claimant withdrew claims for age discrimination and unfair dismissal, the Tribunal had no jurisdiction over the victimisation claim, and the amendment to add a part-time worker claim was refused, resulting in all claims being dismissed.
Both claims were struck out because the claimant had less than two years' service and therefore lacked the statutory right to bring them.
The claim was struck out because the claimant did not comply with Tribunal orders and failed to respond to a strike out warning, making a fair trial impossible.
The claim was struck out because it was presented outside the statutory time limit, and the Tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the Claimant to have brought the proceedings in time.
The claimant succeeded on claims of failure to make reasonable adjustments (not allowing him to continue without attending violent incidents), discrimination arising from disability, and unfair dismissal, but lost on other reasonable adjustment claims.
All claims were dismissed, including a withdrawal of certain protected acts and detriments, and the tribunal found the claimant was not disabled at the material time.
Both complaints were dismissed as not well-founded.
The respondent was ordered to pay compensation after the claimant's pregnancy and maternity discrimination claims were successful.
The tribunal found that the respondent did not discriminate against the claimant on grounds of disability; the manager's actions were reasonable and not linked to the claimant's disability, and no harassment or victimisation occurred.
The claim was dismissed because it was not presented within the time limit, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction.
All claims of direct race discrimination, victimisation, and unauthorised deduction from wages were dismissed or withdrawn by the claimant.
The Tribunal dismissed all claims because the claimant failed to establish less favourable treatment, a discriminatory provision criterion or practice, unwanted conduct related to age, or any detriment as a part-time worker, and the part-time worker claim was also out of time.
The tribunal dismissed all disability-related claims because the claimant was not found to be disabled at the relevant times.
All complaints were dismissed as not well-founded.
The complaint was dismissed because it was presented after the time limit and it was reasonably practicable to have presented it in time.
The claimant succeeded on all main claims including constructive unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, harassment, victimisation, and partially on sex discrimination and reasonable adjustments.
The unfair dismissal claim succeeded but compensation was reduced to zero due to 100% Polkey and contributory fault reductions; the unauthorised deductions claim succeeded but remedy is yet to be determined; the disability discrimination claims failed.
The claimant's claim of constructive unfair dismissal failed because the alleged breaches, even where admitted, did not objectively amount to a fundamental breach of the implied term of trust and confidence, and the claimant had not resigned in response to any such breach.
The claimant succeeded in her claim for disability discrimination due to the respondent's failure to make reasonable adjustments.
The direct disability discrimination and harassment complaints were dismissed as out of time and it was not just and equitable to extend time, but the failure to make reasonable adjustments complaint was allowed to proceed because it was just and equitable to extend time for that complaint.
All remaining claims were not well founded and were dismissed; the tribunal also found that claims (except unfair dismissal) were out of time and it would not be just and equitable to extend time.
The claims were not well founded and were dismissed in their entirety.
The claimant's complaints of harassment and health and safety detriment were withdrawn, and the direct sex discrimination claim was dismissed as not well founded.
The claimant's claims were dismissed by the Employment Tribunal.
Decisions are sourced from official GOV.UK Employment Tribunal publications.
Important: Summaries and statistics are automated. Always verify against the original decision documents.