Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Bury St Edmunds.
£49,170.03 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Marks and Spencer plc
The claimant succeeded in her claims for unpaid company sick pay, pension contributions, and injury to feelings, with the tribunal ordering the respondent to pay £21,667.32 in total.
Reference: 6006866/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Buck Inn Flixton Ltd
The respondent failed to pay the claimant his statutory redundancy, unpaid wages for two days, and notice pay.
Reference: 3304867/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Buck Inn Flixton Ltd
The respondent failed to attend the hearing and the claimant's claims for redundancy, unpaid wages, notice pay, and holiday pay were well-founded.
Reference: 3304866/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: High Point Solutions Ltd
The majority of the claims were struck out because the tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear them as they had been brought too late.
Reference: 6033285/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Look Ahead Care, Support and Housing Ltd
The complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed.
Reference: 6021166/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: The Retreats (Cambridge) Ltd
The claim for pregnancy and maternity discrimination was dismissed upon withdrawal, but the claim for automatic unfair dismissal succeeded.
Reference: 6008209/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Bedfordshire Fire and Rescue Service
The Tribunal dismissed both claims, finding that the respondent did not breach the implied term of trust and confidence and that the claimant was not constructively dismissed.
Reference: 3302198/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Oxfordshire County Council
The complaints of direct race discrimination and harassment related to race failed and were dismissed because the tribunal found no less favourable treatment or unwanted conduct related to race.
Reference: 3314392/2023 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: IQVIA Ltd and Ms S Tranter
The claimant failed to prove that her impairment was likely to last 12 months at the relevant time, as the evidence showed her pain had substantially resolved within 3 months.
Reference: 3307564/2020 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Nuclear Waste Services Ltd
All discrimination, harassment, victimisation, equal pay, and constructive unfair dismissal claims were dismissed on their merits, and the only breach (failure to provide updated particulars) attracted no award.
Reference: 3309679/2023 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Mr D Turner and Mrs M Turner T/a The Nook Cafe
The Claimant succeeded in part on her claims for unauthorised deductions and failure to provide a s.1 statement, but all other complaints (including automatic unfair dismissal, discrimination, harassment, and detriment) were dismissed.
Reference: 3310767/2023 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: PeoplePlus Group Ltd
The complaint of unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed by the tribunal.
Reference: 3305021/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Your Sign Shop Ltd
The claimant succeeded in all claims (redundancy payment, holiday pay, notice pay) as the respondent failed to attend or defend the proceedings.
Reference: 6017489/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Your World Healthcare
The claimant's complaint of unlawful deductions from wages was well-founded and allowed.
Reference: 3303530/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: CGS Administrative Services Ltd
The constructive unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to prove a fundamental breach of contract or that he resigned in response to such a breach; the holiday pay claim succeeded for two days' pay.
Reference: 6016485/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.