Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at London South.
£518,121.77 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: RCB Healthcare Group and Mrs M Butland
All claims dismissed as the claimant and her daughter were found not to be disabled, and the time-off claim failed.
Employer: ABM Facility Services UK Ltd
The Tribunal dismissed the claims, finding that the Respondent's dismissal was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim, and that the Respondent had not failed to make reasonable adjustments as no suitable adjustments were available.
Employer: RPC Land & New Homes Ltd
The Tribunal found no breach of the implied term of trust and confidence, and therefore no constructive dismissal, so both claims were dismissed on the merits.
Employer: Ingeus UK Ltd
The claimant's remaining discrimination complaints were struck out because she failed to pay the deposit ordered by the Tribunal.
Employer: Aramark Defence Services Ltd
The claim was dismissed because it was presented out of time and it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit.
Employer: Guys and St Thomas’ NHS Trust and Others
All claims were struck out because the claimant failed to comply with a case management order and a further order requiring her to accept the list of issues, making a fair trial impossible.
Employer: Kew College
The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal, notice pay, arrears of pay and public interest disclosure detriment claims as out of time, but allowed the race discrimination and harassment claims to proceed to a final hearing.
Employer: Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis
The tribunal dismissed the direct race discrimination claim in its entirety, finding that the claimant had not established primary facts from which an inference of race discrimination could be drawn and that the respondent's actions were based on genuine performance and progression concerns.
Employer: Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd
All of the claimant's complaints were dismissed at the final merits hearing on 1-4 September 2026.
Employer: Secretary of State for Justice and N Hollihead
The Tribunal found no discrimination or harassment as a matter of law, and the wage deductions were authorised by the claimant's contract, so all claims were dismissed on the merits.
Employer: P and J Dust Extraction Ltd
The claim was dismissed as not well founded, meaning the claimant failed to establish the merits of the case.
Employer: EvergreeenKent Ltd
The claimant was unfairly dismissed for asserting a statutory right under the Working Time Regulations 1998, but no compensation was awarded.
Employer: BUF Architecture Ltd
The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,283.06 gross.
Employer: D&D Management Ltd
The claimant succeeded on the ordinary unfair dismissal claim but lost on all other claims, and no compensation was awarded because the claimant withdrew the remedy application.
Employer: Secretary of State for Justice
The unfair dismissal claim was struck out because the claimant had less than two years' service, and the discrimination claims were allowed to proceed after time limit extension.
Employer: Compass Group, UK and Ireland
The claimant's claim of direct age discrimination was not well-founded and was dismissed.
Employer: Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was dismissed, but his claim for unauthorised deductions from wages succeeded regarding work on 7th November 2024.
Employer: St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
The claim failed because the Band 8d job evaluation outcome did not create a contractual entitlement: the requisite signatories (line manager, budget holder and DDO) did not approve the form, so there was no valid contractual variation.
Employer: Dental Rooms Group Ltd
The claimant succeeded on three victimisation claims but failed on other discrimination, harassment, and most wage deduction claims, with no monetary award made at this liability stage.
Employer: Trustees of St Joseph's Specialist Trust
All claims were either withdrawn by the claimant or dismissed on their merits or for being presented outside the applicable time limits.
Employer: Bombardier Services (UK) Ltd
The respondent did not make an unauthorised deduction because the claimant was on sick leave and not available for work, so he was properly paid sick pay rather than full wages.
Employer: M.i. Media Services Ltd and Others
The claim against the fourth respondent was struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success, as the alleged causal connection between the protected disclosures and Mr Kyffin's role in the internal appeal was tenuous and inadequately pleaded.
Employer: Wagco Ltd (in voluntary liquidation)
The respondent made unlawful deductions from wages by failing to pay wages for three months, and the outstanding balance after Insolvency Service payment is ordered to be paid.
Employer: Reed Talent Solutions Ltd and London Fire Commissioner
All claims were dismissed as out of time, lacking jurisdiction, or having no reasonable prospects of success.
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.