Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at London South.
£518,121.77 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Maximus UK Services Ltd
All claims were dismissed by the Employment Tribunal.
Employer: Mitie Care and Custody Ltd
The overall verdict is split because Mr Lehan's unfair dismissal claim was dismissed and his wrongful dismissal/holiday pay claims were withdrawn, while Mr Maynard's unfair dismissal claim succeeded.
Employer: Elite Hair Lounge Ltd
The claimant succeeded in her automatic unfair dismissal claim and in some, but not all, of her discrimination claims; some claims were withdrawn earlier.
Employer: SE Trains Ltd
The claimant resigned voluntarily and was not dismissed by the respondent; the resignation was a consensual decision to avoid a potential capability dismissal.
Employer: Recycled Streetwear Ltd
All claims dismissed because the claimant failed to prove unlawful deductions (or claims were time-barred), the respondent provided itemised pay statements, and the holiday pay claim was unparticularised.
Employer: Bupa Care Services Ltd
The claimant's claims under Working Time Regulations were struck out for no reasonable prospects, and his religion/belief discrimination and Health and Safety claims were withdrawn, while other claims remain pending.
Employer: Brighton and Hove City Council
The interim relief application was presented out of time, and the claimant failed to show it was not reasonably practicable to present it earlier, so the rejection was confirmed.
Employer: Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust
All three complaints were dismissed as not well-founded.
Employer: South Bank Colleges
The claimant succeeded in victimisation, constructive unfair dismissal, holiday pay, notice pay, and SSP claims, but failed in disability discrimination and harassment claims.
Employer: Kinoya Ltd
The claimant's complaints were dismissed because the employer had effectively provided payslips via a digital link (constructive giving) and the holiday pay was fully paid after termination, so no unlawful deduction remained.
Employer: Splash Damage Ltd
The claims were struck out because the claimant's death made it impossible to have a fair hearing, as the respondent could not test the claimant's evidence on the central issue of disability.
Employer: Park Avenue Healthcare Ltd
The claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments succeeded, but all other claims (direct race and disability discrimination, harassment, holiday pay) were dismissed.
Employer: Comave UK Ltd
The claim was dismissed under Rule 47 because the claimant indicated the matter had been resolved by payment and neither party attended the hearing.
Employer: New Life Balance Ltd
The claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to attend the final hearing and had not actively pursued the claim.
Employer: ISS Facility Services Ltd
The claim was struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success and the claimant failed to comply with an Unless Order.
Employer: King’s College London and L Sanderson
The entire claim was struck out as vexatious and an abuse of process under Rule 38(1)(a), because the claimant repeatedly re-litigated matters already decided or which could have been raised in earlier proceedings.
Employer: The Secretary of State for Justice
The claimant succeeded only on her harassment related to sex claim (a comment in February 2018), while all other claims were dismissed.
Employer: WPP 2005 Ltd
Claimant failed to establish that he was a disabled person under section 6 of the Equality Act 2010, so all discrimination claims dependent on disability status were dismissed.
Employer: Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust
The claims of direct race discrimination and victimisation were not well-founded on the merits because the redundancy process was fair, the claimant was not treated less favourably because of her race, and the decision-makers were unaware of her protected act.
Employer: Mashtraxx Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation)
The claimant won on claims for wages, breach of contract (notice and expenses), redundancy, and holiday pay but lost on a separate claim for compensation for lost share options.
Employer: Macmillan Cancer Support
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was struck out for lack of service, and his claims of direct race discrimination, victimisation, and wrongful dismissal were dismissed on their merits.
Employer: Advanced New Technology Ltd
The claimant was not constructively dismissed because the employer's conduct did not amount to a fundamental breach of contract, and the claimant's resignation was not in response to any such breach.
Employer: Brighton And Hove City Council
placeholder
Employer: Ocado Central Services Ltd
The claimant succeeded on the unfair dismissal claim but failed on all other claims, resulting in a split verdict.
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.