Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at London South.
£98,029.47 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Manger Moi Ltd
The claimant succeeded on claims for unauthorised deductions and failure to provide written particulars, but the indirect sex discrimination claim was dismissed.
Reference: 2311750/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Mad Lab Fitness Ltd (in voluntary liquidation)
The Employment Tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by the respondent.
Reference: 6037629/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Portofino London Ltd
The respondent failed to present a response, so the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded and succeeded.
Reference: 6001234/2026 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Orion Education (formerly Eden Park High School)
All complaints were dismissed as not well-founded.
Reference: 2306584/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Brickowner Ltd
The Tribunal found that the Respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and was obliged to pay a redundancy payment, resulting in a total award of £14,203.83.
Reference: 6030617/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Home Office
The claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was dismissed as not well-founded.
Reference: 6020810/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Harrods Ltd
The claims for unfair dismissal and failure to make reasonable adjustments were struck out because the claimant had no reasonable prospects of obtaining an extension of time, while the discrimination arising from disability claim survives.
Reference: 6043072/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Collection Pot Ltd
The tribunal found that the claimant's protected disclosures were not the principal reason for dismissal; genuine concerns about the claimant's work and conduct were the effective cause.
Reference: 6012249/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Fresh Food Enterprises Ltd
The unfair dismissal and redundancy claims were dismissed for lack of qualifying service, but the claimants succeeded on claims for unpaid wages, commission, notice pay, and holiday pay.
Reference: 2310022/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: London Borough of Southwark
Both complaints of unfair dismissal and direct race discrimination were found not well-founded and dismissed.
Reference: 6010809/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Jusan Technologies Ltd and Mr M R Wahid
The claimant succeeded in his claim that he was subjected to detriment for making protected disclosures about financial misconduct.
Reference: 6003675/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Pries Appliances Ltd
The respondent unlawfully deducted wages and failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars, resulting in a total award of £3,287.50.
Reference: 6017866/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: TJ Morris Ltd T/a Home Bargains
The claim of constructive unfair dismissal succeeded (with 15% contributory fault), but the wages claim was dismissed.
Reference: 6007610/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: UK Power Networks (Operations) Ltd
The claimant's claims of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, and breach of contract were dismissed as not well founded.
Reference: 2305798/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: BAU Firms Ltd
The respondent made an unauthorised deduction of £300 from the claimant's wages.
Reference: 6001586/2026 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: St Andrews Centre
All claims were dismissed under Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend the hearing.
Reference: 6018304/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: London Eco Solutions Ltd
The claim for wrongful termination of the apprenticeship contract was well founded, and the respondent was ordered to pay damages.
Reference: 2309100 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: D & D Leasing UK Ltd
The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was found to be well-founded by consent.
Reference: 6044070/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: 68 Plus Ltd
The Tribunal found the claims for unauthorised deductions and holiday pay well-founded and that the Respondent failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars.
Reference: 6002417/2026 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Greene King Retail Services Ltd
The claim was dismissed under Rule 47 because the claimant failed to attend the hearing and had consistently failed to comply with the Tribunal's directions.
Reference: 6003607/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: ABM Facility Services UK Ltd
The claim for unfair dismissal was struck out, while the complaints of disability discrimination were permitted to continue.
Reference: 6040980/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
The claimant succeeded on unfair dismissal (but compensatory award reduced to zero due to 100% chance of fair dismissal), unauthorised deductions, and holiday pay claims, but failed on all disability discrimination claims.
Reference: 2301701/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Arriva Rail London Ltd
The claim was struck out due to the claimant's failure to comply with Tribunal Rules or orders and the resulting impossibility of a fair hearing.
Reference: 6022112/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Sustainable Agriculture Initiative (SAI) Platform
The Tribunal found the claimant was an independent contractor and not an employee or worker, meaning the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear the claims.
Reference: 2306370/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.