Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Nottingham.
£57,377.64 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Mr A Waqas
All claims were dismissed or struck out; the claimant did not succeed on any claim.
Employer: MG Solutions (UK) Ltd
The tribunal dismissed all three claims, finding the dismissal fair, the claimant guilty of gross misconduct, and no entitlement to notice pay or unpaid wages.
Employer: C and others
The claimants won on constructive unfair dismissal and victimisation/discrimination but other claims were not upheld, resulting in a split verdict.
Employer: Lacehouse Kitchen Ltd (Sauce Shop)
The Employment Judge found the dismissal was fair because the employer had a genuine belief in the misconduct, conducted a reasonable investigation, followed a fair procedure, and the decision to dismiss was within the range of reasonable responses; therefore the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.
Employer: Railway Electrical Services Ltd
The claimant failed to prove he was disabled at the material time, resulting in the dismissal of all claims.
Employer: Red Firs Carehome Ltd
The Tribunal dismissed the claims on jurisdictional grounds because the claim was presented out of time and the Claimant did not provide a reasonable explanation for the additional delay.
Employer: Specsavers Optical Superstores Ltd
The claims were dismissed because the claimant withdrew them and did not reserve the right to bring further claims, and the tribunal found no reason not to issue the mandatory dismissal.
Employer: Royal Mail Group Ltd
The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal claim and awarded compensation, reducing the compensatory award by 60% for contributory fault.
Employer: Nottingham Trent University
The respondent failed to deal with the flexible working request in a reasonable manner, failed to consult, and failed to notify within the decision period, but the rejection was not based on incorrect facts.
Employer: 365 People
The respondent made an unauthorised deduction of £100 from the claimant's pay, which was well-founded.
Employer: Roost Opco 1 Ltd T/a Student Roost
Claimant failed to attend hearings and comply with orders; unfair dismissal struck out for lack of jurisdiction and other claims dismissed for non-attendance.
Employer: Grice Collins Long Ltd and Mr A Stanhope
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim failed because the employer had a genuine belief in his misconduct based on reasonable grounds, conducted a fair process, and dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses. The wrongful dismissal claim failed because the claimant's conduct amounted to repudiatory breach.
Employer: University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
Claimant succeeded in unfair dismissal because Respondent failed to obtain further medical evidence or consider alternative roles before dismissing, but discrimination claims failed due to lack of causative link or substantial disadvantage.
Employer: Adullam Homes Housing Association
The claim of automatically unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed.
Employer: MJW Asbestos Removal and Reinsulation Services Ltd
The Tribunal found that the claimant resigned and was not dismissed, so the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.
Employer: Nottingham City Council
The claimant lost because the tribunal found the employer had a reasonable belief in misconduct, conducted a reasonable investigation despite the claimant's non‑engagement, and dismissal fell within the range of reasonable responses.
Employer: Jamia Al-Karam (a registered charity)
The complaint of unfair dismissal was struck out because it was presented out of time when it was reasonably practicable to present it in time.
Employer: Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust
The Tribunal found the dismissal was unfair because the employer failed to follow its own disciplinary policy and constitution, the investigation was inadequate, and the decision to dismiss was outside the range of reasonable responses given the claimant's open use of vehicles with management approval and the lack of any clear policy prohibition.
Employer: Blachford UK Ltd
The claimant failed to prove that his dismissal was for asserting a statutory right or for raising health and safety concerns; the employer dismissed for capability reasons.
Employer: HCM Electrical Ltd
The tribunal found that the claimant's age materially influenced the decision to withdraw the offer of work, that he was treated less favourably than a younger comparator, and that the treatment was not a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.
Employer: Slenderella Wholesale Ltd
The claimant succeeded on all claims because the respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments for her disability, which led to her constructive unfair dismissal and breach of the Flexible Working Regulations.
Employer: Nottingham City Council
All claims were dismissed or withdrawn; the Claimant was found not to be disabled and discrimination claims failed on the facts, with other claims also dismissed.
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.