Sector Report
Education Tribunal Data Analysis
Latest legal precedents and outcome patterns in the Education sector based on our 12-month database analysis.
211Cases Analysed (Last 12 Months)
Historical Education decisions from our database catalogue.
34%Success Factor
Proportion of claims won or split/upheld in our database.
66%Dismissal Rate
Claims lost or struck out due to procedural/jurisdictional issues.
↑ Strongest IndicatorUnfair dismissal (55% Success)
↓ Weakest IndicatorUnfair Dismissal and Discrimination (20% Success)
Search by Claim Type
Showing 17 cases from the last 2 months.
6022364/2024 • 9 Jul 2026
won
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim succeeded, but the award was reduced for contributory fault and the Polkey chance of fair dismissal, and the parties agreed on remedy without specifying a sum in the judgment.
Legal Issues (1)
- Unfair dismissal; Polkey reduction; contributory fault; refusal of amendment to add breach of contract claim.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
2303124/2024 • 3 Jul 2026
lost
All complaints were found not well-founded and were dismissed.
Legal Issues (3)
- Unfair dismissal
- direct race discrimination
- unlawful deductions from wages/breach of contract.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6045060/2025 • 30 Jun 2026
lost
The complaint of breach of contract was not well founded and was dismissed.
Legal Issues (1)
- Breach of contract claim
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6042321/2025 • 24 Jun 2026
jurisdiction_dismissal
The claims were validly settled under a settlement agreement, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear them and they were dismissed.
Legal Issues (1)
- Validity of a settlement agreement; jurisdiction of the employment tribunal where a claim has been validly settled.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
3200253/2025 • 23 Jun 2026
struck_out
The case was dismissed under rule 47 because none of the claimants attended the hearing and they had failed to comply with previous orders to provide necessary information.
Legal Issues (1)
- Rule 47 dismissal for non-attendance; discretion of tribunal; failure to comply with case management orders; potential time limit issues for claims presented after termination.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
2308768/2025 • 21 Jun 2026
split
The claimants won on protective award, some unfair dismissal, breach of contract, and wrongful dismissal claims, but lost on reasonable adjustments claim and some claims were withdrawn, resulting in a split outcome.
Legal Issues (1)
- Collective redundancy consultation obligations under s.188 TULR(C)A 1992; protective award under s.189; unfair dismissal under ERA 1996; disability discrimination (s.15 EqA 2010) for failure to consult and dismiss; breach of contract for unpaid holiday pay; wrongful dismissal claims.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6014130/2024 • 16 Jun 2026
won
The Tribunal found that the claimant's claims of unlawful discrimination, wrongful dismissal, and unauthorised deductions of statutory maternity pay were all well-founded and succeeded.
Legal Issues (1)
- Unlawful discrimination on grounds related to pregnancy/maternity; wrongful dismissal for failure to provide notice pay; unauthorised deductions from statutory maternity pay.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
3311626/2024 • 11 Jun 2026
won
The tribunal found the dismissal unfair because the investigation was flawed (unbalanced, prejudged, incomplete) and the sanction of dismissal fell outside the range of reasonable responses.
Legal Issues (2)
- Whether the dismissal was fair under s98 Employment Rights Act 1996 – the employer relied on conduct; the tribunal assessed the reasonableness of the investigation and sanction
- applying the band of reasonable responses test. Procedural unfairness in the investigation and failure to consider the claimant's inexperience were key.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
1311276/2024 • 9 Jun 2026
lost
All complaints were either withdrawn by the Claimant or found not well-founded and dismissed because the Tribunal concluded the Respondent's actions were not due to disability or religion, but rather due to a preference for another candidate and concerns about the Claimant's performance.
Legal Issues (8)
- Direct disability discrimination (s.13 EqA 2010)
- direct religion/belief discrimination (s.13 EqA 2010)
- discrimination arising from disability (s.15 EqA 2010)
- indirect discrimination
- failure to make reasonable adjustments
- harassment
- victimisation
- and time limits.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
2305951/2024 • 8 Jun 2026
struck_out
The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to comply with a tribunal order and did not actively pursue the claim, and did not respond to a warning letter.
Legal Issues (1)
- Striking out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for non-compliance with an order and failure to actively pursue the claim; overriding objective and fair trial considerations.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6013860/2024 • 5 Jun 2026
lost
The claimant was not unfairly dismissed and her claim had no reasonable prospect of success.
Legal Issues (1)
- Unfair dismissal; unreasonable pursuit of claim leading to costs order.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6033618/2025 • 5 Jun 2026
struck_out
The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to comply with Case Management Orders and did not actively pursue the claim, and did not respond to a warning letter.
Legal Issues (1)
- Strike out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for non-compliance with case management orders and failure to actively pursue the claim.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6039843/2025 • 2 Jun 2026
won
The respondent failed to present a valid response, and the tribunal made a default judgment under rule 22, upholding the claimant's claims for unpaid wages, notice pay, and holiday pay.
Legal Issues (1)
- Unauthorised deductions from wages (Employment Rights Act 1996 s.13); breach of contract in respect of notice; failure to pay holiday pay (Working Time Regulations).
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
2306584/2024 • 29 May 2026
lost
All complaints were dismissed as not well-founded.
Legal Issues (5)
- Direct disability discrimination
- failure to make reasonable adjustments
- harassment related to disability
- victimisation
- and constructive dismissal.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
3202158/2024 • 29 May 2026
won
All three complaints (unfair dismissal, whistleblowing detriment, and disability discrimination) were found to be well-founded and succeeded.
Legal Issues (3)
- Unfair dismissal
- detriment for protected disclosures
- direct disability discrimination.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
2402708/2020 • 28 May 2026
struck_out
The claims were struck out because the claimants did not actively pursue them and failed to respond to the Tribunal's warning letter.
Legal Issues (1)
- Strike out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for failure to actively pursue the claim; overriding objective considered.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
2404796/2025 • 28 May 2026
won
The claims for unauthorised deductions and redundancy payment were well-founded and the respondent did not contest them.
Legal Issues (1)
- Unauthorised deductions from wages under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996; entitlement to a statutory redundancy payment; rule 22 default judgment due to non-contestation.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
Data sources
Decisions are sourced from official GOV.UK Employment Tribunal publications.
Important: Summaries and statistics are automated. Always verify against the original decision documents.