Sector Report
Tech Tribunal Data Analysis
Latest legal precedents and outcome patterns in the Tech sector based on our 12-month database analysis.
180Cases Analysed (Last 12 Months)
Historical Tech decisions from our database catalogue.
51%Success Factor
Proportion of claims won or split/upheld in our database.
49%Dismissal Rate
Claims lost or struck out due to procedural/jurisdictional issues.
↑ Strongest IndicatorUnfair Dismissal (41% Success)
↓ Weakest IndicatorDisability Discrimination (29% Success)
Search by Claim Type
Showing 15 cases from the last 2 months.
6014937/2025 • 3 Jul 2026
struck_out
The claim relating to protected disclosures was struck out at a preliminary hearing.
Legal Issues (1)
- Whether the claim had any reasonable prospect of success or was otherwise properly brought; the tribunal struck out the entire claim in relation to protected disclosures.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
8003002/2025 • 24 Jun 2026
lost
The Tribunal found that the employer had a genuine belief in the claimant's misconduct, reasonable grounds for that belief, and carried out a reasonable investigation, and that dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses.
Legal Issues (3)
- Whether the dismissal was fair under section 98(4) ERA 1996; whether the employer had a genuine belief in misconduct
- reasonable grounds for that belief
- and carried out a reasonable investigation; whether dismissal fell within the range of reasonable responses.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6020949/2024 • 18 Jun 2026
lost
All complaints were not well-founded and dismissed by the tribunal.
Legal Issues (3)
- Unfair dismissal (s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996)
- direct disability discrimination (s.13 Equality Act 2010)
- unfavourable treatment arising from disability (s.15 Equality Act 2010).
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
2303416/2024 • 17 Jun 2026
won
The Claimant succeeded in claims of discrimination and unfair dismissal against the Second Respondent, resulting in a total compensation award of £116,483.38.
Legal Issues (5)
- Discrimination (pecuniary and non-pecuniary)
- Unfair Dismissal
- ACAS Uplift
- Grossing up of compensation
- Interest on awards.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
2301995/2024 • 17 Jun 2026
lost
The complaints of direct race discrimination were not well-founded and were dismissed.
Legal Issues (1)
- Direct race discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010; burden of proof; whether the claimant's race was a factor in the alleged treatment.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
8000731/2025 • 17 Jun 2026
lost
The Tribunal dismissed the claims because the claimant's communications did not constitute protected disclosures as they did not disclose information tending to show a breach of a legal obligation or other qualifying failure, and in any event, the decision-makers were unaware of the alleged disclosures at the time of dismissal.
Legal Issues (1)
- Whether the claimant made qualifying protected disclosures; whether the disclosures were the principal reason for her dismissal; entitlement to a contractual redundancy payment.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6011664/2025 • 16 Jun 2026
won
The tribunal found that the claimant had a disability (anxiety) for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 during the relevant period.
Legal Issues (1)
- Whether the claimant's anxiety constituted a disability under Section 6 Equality Act 2010.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6006361/2024 • 5 Jun 2026
lost
The Tribunal dismissed all disability discrimination claims because the claimant did not have a disability as defined by section 6 of the Equality Act 2010.
Legal Issues (1)
- Definition of disability under the Equality Act 2010; burden of proof for establishing a disability; withdrawal of a wrongful dismissal claim.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6028790/2025 • 4 Jun 2026
lost
The complaint of unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed by the Employment Tribunal.
Legal Issues (1)
- Unfair dismissal complaint
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6007984/2025 • 4 Jun 2026
lost
The claimant's claim of unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed.
Legal Issues (1)
- Unfair dismissal under the Employment Rights Act 1996
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6018699/2025 • 3 Jun 2026
lost
The claimant lost both claims: the unfair dismissal complaint was not well-founded, and the disability discrimination complaint was dismissed because she was not a disabled person under the Equality Act 2010.
Legal Issues (1)
- Time limit for presenting a claim; definition of disability under section 6 Equality Act 2010; merits of unfair dismissal and reasonable adjustments claims.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6009880/2024 • 3 Jun 2026
lost
The claimant's claims for unfair dismissal, unlawful deduction of wages, and wrongful dismissal failed because the tribunal found the respondent's performance concerns were genuine and the dismissal was fair.
Legal Issues (1)
- Whether the dismissal for gross misconduct was fair; whether there were unlawful deductions from wages; whether the claimant was entitled to notice pay.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
2303862/2024 • 3 Jun 2026
lost
The Tribunal found that the Claimant was not dismissed but had voluntarily resigned, and that none of the alleged discriminatory acts or failures occurred, or if they did, they were not because of her disability.
Legal Issues (5)
- Whether the Claimant was dismissed (expressly or constructively) for the purposes of unfair dismissal; whether the Respondent's actions constituted direct disability discrimination
- discrimination arising from disability
- failure to make reasonable adjustments
- harassment related to disability
- and victimisation under the Equality Act 2010; and whether any claims were out of time.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6041649/2025 • 2 Jun 2026
won
The claimant was constructively unfairly dismissed as the respondent's conduct amounted to a fundamental breach of contract entitling the claimant to resign.
Legal Issues (1)
- Constructive unfair dismissal under section 98 Employment Rights Act 1996; recoupment of benefits provisions applied.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
3311314/2024 • 26 May 2026
won
The claimant was unfairly dismissed as the respondent failed to follow a fair procedure and the reason for dismissal was not established, and the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages.
Legal Issues (1)
- Whether the claimant was dismissed or resigned; whether the dismissal was fair; whether deductions from wages were authorised; application of Polkey and contributory fault.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
Data sources
Decisions are sourced from official GOV.UK Employment Tribunal publications.
Important: Summaries and statistics are automated. Always verify against the original decision documents.