Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions involving DHL Services Ltd.
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Heard at Cambridge
The claims were dismissed because the tribunal found no fundamental breach of contract by the respondent and no protected disclosures had been made, with the claimant's evidence being unreliable and the respondent's actions justified.
Reference: 3310751/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Heard at Reading
The tribunal concluded the dismissal was unfair and upheld the claimant’s claim.
Reference: 3310770/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Heard at Watford
The tribunal concluded the claimant had refused the required drug and alcohol test, breaching the substance‑misuse policy, so the dismissal was not automatically unfair nor a protected detriment.
Reference: 3306439/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Heard at London South
Both the unauthorised deductions claim and the breach of contract claim were dismissed.
Reference: 6028593/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Heard at Birmingham
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim of direct disability discrimination but dismissed the claim that DHL failed to make reasonable adjustments.
Reference: 6012592/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.