Employment Tribunal decisions and outcome patterns in the Transport & Logistics sector from the last 12 months.
Final Transport & Logistics decisions with at least one determined claim.
Proportion of cases won or split/upheld in our database.
Cases lost or struck out due to procedural/jurisdictional issues.
Showing 15 cases from the last 2 months.
Browse the latest published decisions for employers represented in this sector sample.
The claimant won on unfair dismissal and reasonable adjustments but lost on direct disability discrimination, resulting in a split verdict.
The claimant's complaints of sexual harassment and victimisation were dismissed by the Tribunal.
The claimant was not an employee of the respondent, so the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed and the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction for the other claims.
The claimant succeeded on three harassment claims but lost all other claims, including constructive unfair dismissal and most reasonable adjustment and discrimination complaints.
The disability discrimination claims were found to be unfounded and dismissed.
The claims of unfair dismissal, unlawful deduction from wages, and whistleblowing were dismissed for want of jurisdiction as they were presented out of time and the claimant failed to establish valid presentation or grounds for an extension.
All claims were dismissed as either not well founded on the facts or brought out of time.
The unfair dismissal claim was struck out due to insufficient qualifying service, the whistleblowing claim was withdrawn, and the discrimination claims continue to a final hearing; the claimant was found to be disabled due to depression.
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was upheld because the respondent did not attend and the tribunal found the dismissal was unfair, awarding compensation for loss of earnings, notice pay, and holiday pay.
The tribunal found no evidence that any of the alleged treatments were because of or related to the claimant's Polish nationality; all complaints were either struck out for lack of jurisdiction or dismissed as not well-founded.
The claimant succeeded on her reasonable adjustment claims in respect of two PCPs and on her s.15 and s.26 claims regarding Issue 5, but failed on all other discrimination claims and the unlawful deductions/holiday pay claims, with one harassment claim dismissed as out of time.
The claimant failed to prove that the comment constituted less favourable treatment or harassment, as he did not complain for 21 months, maintained a professional relationship with the respondent, and the comment was not directed at him.
The respondent did not contest the claim, and the tribunal determined the claims for unpaid wages, holiday pay, and notice pay were well-founded.
The claim was struck out because the claimant did not attend the hearing and had not actively pursued the proceedings.
Because the respondent did not respond to the claim and the Tribunal found all claims to be well founded.
Decisions are sourced from official GOV.UK Employment Tribunal publications.
Important: Summaries and statistics are automated. Always verify against the original decision documents.