Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions involving Harrods Ltd.
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Heard at London South
The provided judgment text is incomplete; it confirms the claimant won on wrongful dismissal (accepted by respondent) but does not include the outcome on the unfair dismissal claim or any remedy award.
Reference: 6005182/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Heard at London South
The claims for unfair dismissal and failure to make reasonable adjustments were struck out because the claimant had no reasonable prospects of obtaining an extension of time, while the discrimination arising from disability claim survives.
Reference: 6043072/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Heard at London Central
Interim relief was denied because the judge was not convinced the claimant was likely to succeed on the unfair dismissal claim, finding the redundancy was genuine and there was insufficient evidence of a protected disclosure or designated health‑and‑safety activity.
Reference: 2206663/2020 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.