17 Jul 2026

Mixed outcome

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination, Unpaid Wages, Breach of Contract and Harassment

The claimant won on unfair dismissal but lost on all other claims (notice pay, holiday pay, disability discrimination, harassment, victimisation).

Legal Issues (10)

Unfair dismissal with Polkey reduction (50% chance of fair dismissal)
ACAS Code uplift (10%)
disability discrimination claims (direct
indirect
discrimination arising from disability
reasonable adjustments
harassment
victimisation) all dismissed
breach of contract for notice pay dismissed
holiday pay claim dismissed.

Reference: 2305964/2024

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)

16 Jul 2026

Claimant won£8,016.38 awarded

Unfair Dismissal

The claim of unfair dismissal succeeded, but the award was significantly reduced due to the Claimant's contributory fault in failing to follow safety protocols.

Legal Issues (4)

Ordinary unfair dismissal
contributory fault
reasonableness of employer's decision to dismiss for gross misconduct
credibility of employee's explanations.

Reference: 2600893/2025

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)

11 Jul 2026

Claim dismissed

Constructive Dismissal, Discrimination and Unpaid Wages

All claims were dismissed as not well-founded after a full merits hearing.

Legal Issues (7)

Time limits under s.123 Equality Act 2010 and s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996
constructive dismissal test (breach of contract
resignation in response
affirmation)
direct discrimination comparators
burden of proof
unauthorised deductions.

Reference: 3302461/2024

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)

10 Jul 2026

Claim dismissed

Redundancy Pay and Unpaid Wages

The claimant was not an employee of Sixmen Limited at the material time, so her claims for redundancy pay and holiday pay were dismissed.

Legal Issues (7)

Whether the claimant was an 'employee' under section 230(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
applying the tests of control
mutuality of obligation
and personal performance from Ready Mixed Concrete and Autoclenz. The tribunal found she lacked the necessary elements of a contract of service
as she exercised sole control
had no defined hours or supervision
and her remuneration was structured as a director's salary.

Reference: 6004854/2026

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)

30 Jun 2026

Claimant won

Unfair Dismissal and Breach of Contract

The respondent dismissed the claimant without any investigation, without putting allegations to her, and without following a fair process, making the dismissal unfair and wrongful.

Legal Issues (8)

Unfair dismissal – whether the employer had a genuine belief in misconduct
carried out a reasonable investigation
and acted within the range of reasonable responses
wrongful dismissal/breach of contract (notice pay)
reinstatement
Polkey reduction
ACAS uplift
contributory fault.

Reference: 6007218/2024

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)

29 Jun 2026

Claim struck out

Discrimination

The specific complaint alleging that 'lack of promotion' was race discrimination was struck out, while the other complaints were allowed to proceed.

Legal Issues (1)

Whether the complaint of race discrimination regarding lack of promotion should be struck out as having no reasonable prospects of success or being otherwise an abuse of process.

Reference: 6014525/2024

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)

29 Jun 2026

Claim struck out

Other

The claim was struck out because the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to decide any of the legal complaints.

Legal Issues (1)

Tribunal jurisdiction under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunals Procedure Rules 2024.

Reference: 6004954/2025

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)

25 Jun 2026

Claim struck out

Unpaid Wages

The claim was struck out because the only remedy available (unpaid holiday pay) had been conceded and paid in full, leaving no extant claim, and the tribunal had no jurisdiction over the remaining complaints regarding delay or tax treatment.

Legal Issues (3)

Strike out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for no reasonable prospect of success
tribunal functus officio after full payment of the only remedy
lack of jurisdiction over tax-related complaints.

Reference: 1304894/2024

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)

18 Jun 2026

Claim dismissed

Whistleblowing

The tribunal dismissed all claims because the claimant failed to establish that he made a protected disclosure or that his dismissal was for that reason.

Legal Issues (1)

Whether the claimant made a protected disclosure and whether his dismissal was automatically unfair due to that disclosure.

Reference: 8002735/2025

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)

18 Jun 2026

Claimant won£21,667.32 awarded

Discrimination and Unpaid Wages

The claimant succeeded in her claims for unpaid company sick pay, pension contributions, and injury to feelings, with the tribunal ordering the respondent to pay £21,667.32 in total.

Legal Issues (5)

Company sick pay entitlement
injury to feelings award (Vento bands)
ACAS Code of Practice reduction
interest calculation
reconciliation of overpaid salary.

Reference: 6006866/2025

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)

18 Jun 2026

Claim struck out

Unfair Dismissal and Breach of Contract

The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to comply with a Tribunal order and did not actively pursue the claim, and did not respond to a warning letter.

Legal Issues (1)

Strike out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for non-compliance with a Tribunal order and failure to actively pursue the claim.

Reference: 3305209/2025

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)

17 Jun 2026

Claimant won£9,682.89 awarded

Unfair Dismissal and Breach of Contract

The claimant succeeded in her claims for unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal, with the tribunal ordering compensation.

Legal Issues (5)

Unfair dismissal
wrongful dismissal
contributory fault
ACAS uplift
loss of statutory rights.

Reference: 6006526/2024

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)

15 Jun 2026

Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal and Unpaid Wages

The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed as it was not presented within the applicable time limit, and the unlawful deduction claim was withdrawn.

Legal Issues (2)

Time limit for presenting unfair dismissal claim
withdrawal of unlawful deduction claim.

Reference: 1402393/2025

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)

15 Jun 2026

Claim struck out

Discrimination

The sex discrimination complaint was struck out because it had no reasonable prospects of success and the claimant failed to respond to the Tribunal's warning.

Legal Issues (2)