The Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police employment tribunal cases

Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions involving The Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police.

Cases (last 2 years): 4
Tribunal locations (last 2 years): 1
Recorded awards (last 2 years): 0

Published decisions

Five most recent decisions

Newest decisions first

3 Sept 2026

Claim dismissed

Constructive Dismissal, Discrimination and Harassment

Heard at Reading

All claims of race discrimination, harassment and discriminatory constructive dismissal were dismissed on the merits after a full hearing.

Legal Issues (4)

Direct race discrimination under s.13 Equality Act 2010
harassment related to race under s.26 Equality Act 2010
constructive dismissal for a discriminatory reason
whether conduct amounted to a repudiatory breach of the implied term of trust and confidence.

Reference: 3306924/2024

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)

12 Feb 2026

Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal

Heard at Reading

The claim was dismissed because the claimant did not attend the hearing.

Legal Issues (2)

Dismissal of the claim for non‑attendance under Rule 47
no substantive merits of the unfair dismissal claim were addressed.

Reference: 6018637/2024

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)

25 Nov 2024

Mixed outcome

Discrimination, Breach of Contract, Harassment and Other

Heard at Reading

The claimant succeeded on some reasonable adjustment and harassment claims but failed on most other discrimination and victimisation claims, and the constructive dismissal and data protection claims were struck out for lack of jurisdiction.

Legal Issues (6)

Disability discrimination under the Equality Act 2010
including reasonable adjustments
direct discrimination
discrimination arising from disability
harassment
and victimisation. Jurisdictional issue regarding police officers bringing constructive dismissal and data protection claims.

Reference: 3320105/2019

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)

21 Oct 2024

Claim dismissed

Discrimination

Heard at Reading

The tribunal concluded that the respondent's actions were justified as proportionate means of achieving legitimate aims, and/or the claimant did not establish substantial disadvantage or that the alleged conduct arose from her disability; additionally, several claims were out of time.

Legal Issues (7)

Disability discrimination
reasonable adjustments
discrimination arising from disability
justification
time limits
burden of proof
continuing acts.

Reference: 3302629/2023

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)

Pro case research

Need more cases or more precise results?

Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.

Open Pro Case Search

Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.