Uber London Ltd employment tribunal cases

Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions involving Uber London Ltd.

Cases (last 2 years): 5
Tribunal locations (last 2 years): 1
Recorded awards (last 2 years): 0

Published decisions

Five most recent decisions

Newest decisions first

10 Jul 2026

Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal, Whistleblowing and Breach of Contract

Heard at London East

All claims were dismissed: unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal were presented out of time, and whistleblowing detriment claims were struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success.

Legal Issues (3)

Time limits for wrongful dismissal claims under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994
strike-out of whistleblowing claims under Rule 38(1) of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024
application of Mechkarov principles to strike-out of discrimination/whistleblowing claims.

Reference: 6013986/2025

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)

23 Sept 2025

Claim struck out

Unfair Dismissal

Heard at London East

The claim was struck out because it was scandalous or vexatious, being fundamentally the same as a previously decided case.

Legal Issues (3)

Res judicata
abuse of process
strike out for scandalous or vexatious claim under Rule 38(1)(a)

Reference: 6007656/2025

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)

20 Aug 2025

Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal

Heard at London East

The claim was dismissed because the claimant admitted he was not an employee and the claim was confined to unfair dismissal without the required particulars, leading to its withdrawal.

Legal Issues (3)

1) Whether the claimant satisfied the statutory requirement of being an employee to bring an unfair dismissal claim
2) Whether the claim was sufficiently particularised under the ET1 requirements
3) Potential limitation periods for any new claims that might be filed.

Reference: 3200282/2025

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)

12 Jun 2025

Claim struck out

Unfair Dismissal

The claim was dismissed because it was filed outside the three‑month statutory limitation for unfair dismissal and there was no reasonable prospect of extending the time limit.

Legal Issues (4)

Whether the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim was filed within the statutory three‑month limitation (section 111(2)(a) ERA 1996)
whether the ‘just and equitable’ test (relevant to Equality Act claims) could extend the time limit
whether a six‑year limitation for wrongful dismissal was applicable
and whether the judgment could be reconsidered under Rule 68/70.

Reference: 6002471/2025

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)

1 May 2025

Claim struck out

Unfair Dismissal, Redundancy Pay, Unpaid Wages and Breach of Contract

Heard at London East

The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was struck out because he was not an employee, lacked the requisite 2 years' continuous service, and submitted his claim well out of time without reasonable excuse; all other claims were withdrawn.

Legal Issues (5)

Employment status (worker vs employee)
time limits for unfair dismissal claim
qualifying period (2 years' service)
strike-out for no reasonable prospects
withdrawal of claims.

Reference: 3202211/2024

(View detailed case summary — Pro Research)

Pro case research

Need more cases or more precise results?

Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.

Open Pro Case Search

Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.