Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at London East.
£231,207.14 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: P&A Hydraulics Ltd
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay wages, notice pay, and redundancy payments as required by law, and awarded the full amounts claimed.
Employer: HR & OD Business Solutions Ltd 'in voluntary liquidation'
The respondent failed to respond or attend, and the claimant's unchallenged evidence proved non-payment of wages and expenses.
Employer: Mrs M Wendorff-Kowalczuk and Dell Medical Centre
The claimant failed to prove she was a disabled person at the material time, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the discrimination claim.
Employer: Arriva Kent Thameside Ltd
All claims were dismissed because the claimant failed to establish protected disclosures, discrimination, or any unlawful treatment; some claims were also barred by a prior settlement agreement.
Employer: Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd
The claimant failed to comply with tribunal orders and did not attend the hearing, leading to strikeout of the entire claim.
Employer: Goji Administration Services Ltd and Euroclear SA/NV
The commission structure lacked sufficient certainty to render any sum quantifiable as properly payable, and the post-termination restriction precluded entitlement in any event.
Employer: Sansum Solutions Group Ltd
The complaints of unfair dismissal and breach of contract (dismissal without notice) succeeded; the holiday pay claim was withdrawn after payment.
Employer: Leidos Industrial Engineers Ltd
The claimant won his constructive unfair dismissal claim because the respondent's flawed disciplinary process, trumped-up charges, and unfair final written warning cumulatively breached the implied term of trust and confidence, but lost his whistleblowing claims because the protected disclosure did not materially influence the respondent's actions.
Employer: Property Partners Management Ltd
The claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to attend the hearing without a satisfactory explanation, and his non-attendance was found to be deliberate and contumelious.
Employer: My Lahore Birmingham Ltd and AF Restaurants Ltd
All claims were struck out because they had no reasonable prospect of success or the claimants failed to comply with orders to properly particularise their claims.
Employer: London Borough of Newham
The claim was struck out because there was no reasonable prospect of success; the dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses given the repeated security breaches and a live final written warning.
Employer: Pinnacle Finance and Property Group Ltd
The claim for unauthorised deductions was well-founded and the respondent was ordered to pay the deducted sums.
Employer: Care Premium Ltd
The claimant succeeded in proving that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and failed to pay holiday pay, and the claim was allowed despite being out of time due to reasonable practicability.
Employer: Silverman Opticians Ltd
Claimant won on victimisation (bonus withdrawal) and section 38 claim but lost on direct discrimination, harassment and unfair dismissal.
Employer: Compassion Homes Ltd
Unfair dismissal claim dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; wages claim succeeded by consent.
Employer: London Borough of Havering and Mr D Alexander
All claims were dismissed because the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction due to res judicata/Henderson v Henderson and/or the claims were out of time, with no extension granted.
Employer: Smooth Transfer Ltd
The claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to attend the final hearing without providing any explanation.
Employer: Royal Mail Group Ltd
The claimant succeeded on three harassment claims but lost all other claims, including constructive unfair dismissal and most reasonable adjustment and discrimination complaints.
Employer: Highams Saaz LLP and Mr C Highams
The claimant succeeded in part on wrongful dismissal, wages arrears, holiday pay, and itemised pay statement, but her unfair dismissal and whistleblowing claims were dismissed as out of time, and other claims failed.
Employer: Uber London Ltd
All claims were dismissed: unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal were presented out of time, and whistleblowing detriment claims were struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success.
Employer: PP Management Ltd
The claimant did not attend the hearing and failed to provide a witness statement, leading to dismissal under Rule 47.
Employer: Lola’s Cupcakes Ltd and Mr A Budwig
All claims were dismissed or withdrawn, resulting in no award.
Employer: Metropolitan Care Services Ltd
The Tribunal found in favour of the Claimant on all claims, awarding a total of £28,123 for unpaid wages, holiday pay, wrongful dismissal, and failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars.
Employer: Aecom Ltd
The claim was dismissed on remission because the Tribunal found the claimant was not a genuine applicant for the role.
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.