Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at London East.
£43,021.34 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: La Cappucinosa Ltd
The respondent failed to respond to the claim, resulting in a default judgment ordering payment of the claimed sums.
Reference: 6036026/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: St Mungo Community Housing Association
All complaints were dismissed for want of title and jurisdiction because they were presented outside the statutory time limit, with no grounds for extension or further reasonable period found.
Reference: 6005981/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Britannia Cleaning Ltd
The Tribunal found that the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was well-founded.
Reference: 3200584/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Barnardos
The Tribunal found it lacked jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal complaints because they were filed outside the applicable statutory time limits.
Reference: 3200355/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Redbridge Equalities and Community Council
The claims succeeded because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time, allowing the judge to make a determination under rule 22.
Reference: 6041293/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: EquipTheCreative Ltd (in voluntary liquidation)
The Tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal well-founded and determined that the respondent breached the contract regarding notice pay.
Reference: 6020563/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
The claim was struck out because the claimant lacked the minimum two years of continuous service required to bring an unfair dismissal claim.
Reference: 3200585/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Amazon UK Services Ltd
The tribunal found that the respondent reasonably believed the claimant committed misconduct, conducted a reasonable investigation, and the dismissal was fair.
Reference: 6034887/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: East London Bus and Coach Company Ltd
The Tribunal found the dismissal was for gross misconduct related to safety failures and rejected the claim that it was motivated by protected disclosures.
Reference: 3201600/2023 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust
The claimant succeeded in claims regarding victimisation, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and constructive dismissal, but failed or withdrew claims regarding age discrimination and wage deductions.
Reference: 6008553/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Mitie Ltd
The Tribunal found that the complaints of unfair and wrongful dismissal were not made out and were therefore dismissed.
Reference: 3200491/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Iconic Plastics Ltd
The claimant succeeded in his claims for unfair dismissal and various pay entitlements, but his claim for direct disability discrimination was dismissed.
Reference: 6011351/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.