Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Cardiff.
£64,835.20 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: The Chief Constable of Gwent Police
The entire claim was dismissed because the whistleblowing claim lacked a discernible basis and the disability discrimination claims were out of time.
Employer: Cardiff City Transport Services Ltd
The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to consider the complaints, which were therefore dismissed.
Employer: Home Office
The claim was dismissed in its entirety because the claimant failed to attend the preliminary hearing and did not provide sufficient evidence to justify a postponement or to show that the claims should be allowed to proceed out of time.
Employer: Calon Lan Community Care Ltd
The claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages failed and was dismissed.
Employer: MJ Harris Repairs Ltd (in Administration) and The Secretary of State for Business and Trade
The claim for a protective award was well founded, and the first respondent was ordered to pay £16,961.40.
Employer: EE Ltd
All claims were struck out as having no reasonable prospects of success.
Employer: Cineworld Cinemas Ltd
The claimant did not establish that he had a disability within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010, so his disability discrimination claims were dismissed; the remaining claims were not decided.
Employer: Swansea Bay University Local Health Board
The tribunal dismissed the negligent misstatement complaint because it fell outside the types of complaints Parliament has empowered the tribunal to decide.
Employer: EUI Ltd
The claimant lost all claims: disability discrimination claims were dismissed for lack of disability, and sex harassment claims were struck out as having no reasonable prospects of success.
Employer: Sharief Healthcare Ltd
The first claimant was unfairly dismissed, and both claimants succeeded in their harassment claim, but their alternative direct discrimination claim was dismissed.
Employer: The Chief Constable of South Wales Police
The claimant won on 5 specific victimisation claims but lost on 7 others, resulting in a split verdict on liability with remedy yet to be determined.
Employer: Social Firms Wales Ltd
The claimant won on wrongful dismissal but lost on all other claims, resulting in a split verdict with no additional compensation awarded.
Employer: Rise Contracting Services Ltd and Involve Recruitment Ltd
The claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was dismissed as not well-founded.
Employer: University of South Wales
The claimant won on ordinary unfair dismissal because the respondent's dismissal process was procedurally flawed and the decision fell outside the range of reasonable responses, but all other claims (constructive dismissal, discrimination, whistleblowing, breach of contract, wages) were dismissed.
Employer: Cardiff and Vale University Local Health Board
The claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to prove that the decisions were taken because of the protected act, rather than because of genuine concerns about her conduct identified in the tribunal judgment.
Employer: Capita plc
The claimant's claims of disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, harassment and victimisation were not well founded and were dismissed.
Employer: Home Office
All claims of disability discrimination, harassment, and victimisation were dismissed as not well founded after a full merits hearing.
Employer: The Department for Work and Pensions
All claims were struck out because the claimant failed to comply with Tribunal rules/orders and did not actively pursue the claims.
Employer: MC Sims Ltd
The Tribunal found that the claimant's dismissal was automatically unfair under s. 104 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Employer: Proserve Logistics Ltd
The unfair dismissal claim was struck out due to insufficient qualifying service, the whistleblowing claim was withdrawn, and the discrimination claims continue to a final hearing; the claimant was found to be disabled due to depression.
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.