Unfair Dismissal (TUPE)
Employer: Dippy Co Ltd
Three claimants succeeded in their unfair dismissal claims, but Mr K Platt's claim was dismissed due to non-attendance.
Reference: 2406794/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Manchester.
£31,286.18 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Dippy Co Ltd
Three claimants succeeded in their unfair dismissal claims, but Mr K Platt's claim was dismissed due to non-attendance.
Reference: 2406794/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Castlefield Hospitality Ltd
The respondent made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages, and the claims for unlawful deduction from wages and breach of contract were well founded.
Reference: 6024438/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: 3DGBIRE Ltd
All complaints of disability discrimination and breach of contract were dismissed as not well-founded.
Reference: 2409466/23 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: St Helens Rota Ltd
The claimant was not a worker as defined by statute because she operated her own locum business with no mutual obligation to accept or offer work and was free to walk away without notice.
Reference: 6022882/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: ECig Store Ltd
All claims dismissed because they were presented outside the applicable time limit and it was reasonably practicable to present them in time.
Reference: 6029627/25 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Nightstop Communities Northwest C.I.C.
The respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and failed to provide a written statement of particulars, both claims being well-founded.
Reference: 6033781/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: BT plc and EE Ltd
One specific allegation of harassment was struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success, while the remainder of the strike out application was refused.
Reference: 2407165/2023 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Bay Freight Ltd
The claim for unfair constructive dismissal was found to be well-founded and the respondent agreed to pay the sum claimed for unlawful deduction from wages.
Reference: 6027288/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Solo NW Ltd
The claimant succeeded on a breach of contract claim for notice pay but his unfair dismissal claim was struck out due to insufficient service, and other claims were dismissed.
Reference: 6031550/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: H Demetrios (T/a Brook Hall Hotel)
All claims were dismissed because they were not presented within the applicable time limits and no extension was granted.
Reference: 6025359/25 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Format Creative Studio Ltd
The claimant succeeded on the redundancy payment claim but failed on the breach of contract claim for notice pay.
Reference: 6036174/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Santangeli Ltd
The claimants succeeded because the respondent made them redundant without paying the required redundancy payments, notice pay, and made unauthorized deductions from wages.
Reference: 2405709/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Ryan Speciality Corporate Services Ltd
The majority of the claims were struck out for having no reasonable prospects of success, while others were subject to deposit orders or Unless Orders.
Reference: 2406399/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.