Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Midlands West.
£51,978.84 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: DAPV Ltd
The claimant won on the admitted claims for unpaid wages, holiday pay, and pension contributions, but the claims for unfair constructive dismissal and an unpaid tax rebate remain outstanding and were not determined at this hearing.
Reference: 1311862/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Birmingham City Council
All complaints were dismissed as not well-founded.
Reference: 1307413/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Blundell Trading Ltd
The respondent failed to pay the claimant statutory redundancy pay, overtime, wages, and notice pay, and did not attend the hearing to contest the claims.
Reference: 6022943/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: International Currency Exchange Ltd (in Administration)
The respondent failed to inform and consult the claimant union prior to the redundancies, so a protective award for the maximum 90-day protected period was granted.
Reference: 1305248/2021 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Gemporia Ltd
The claimant's disability discrimination complaint was withdrawn, and the unlawful deductions claim was dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Reference: 6016852/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: St Thomas Aquinas Catholic Multi-Academy Trust
All complaints were either withdrawn by the Claimant or found not well-founded and dismissed because the Tribunal concluded the Respondent's actions were not due to disability or religion, but rather due to a preference for another candidate and concerns about the Claimant's performance.
Reference: 1311276/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Mitie plc
All claims were dismissed because they were presented out of time and the claimant failed to satisfy the tribunal that it was not reasonably practicable (for whistleblowing claims) or just and equitable (for discrimination claims) to extend the time limits.
Reference: 6014247/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: BS Eaton Ltd
The respondent made unlawful deductions from wages because there was no implied term allowing layoff or suspension on reduced pay, and the deduction was not authorized.
Reference: 1309098/2020 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
The respondent consented to reinstatement and the tribunal awarded £18,000 for injury to feelings plus interest, resulting in a full win for the claimant.
Reference: 1306556/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd
The tribunal concluded that the respondent did not fail to make reasonable adjustments because the claimant's request to work from home was not reasonable given the operational needs of the role, particularly the requirement for in-person attendance to perform health and safety assessments, supervise technicians, and conduct performance management meetings.
Reference: 1306027/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: XDP Ltd
The claim was presented out of time and the Tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have presented the claim within the statutory limit.
Reference: 6007679/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.