Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Newcastle.
£17,222.34 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: A Malik
The claimant was unfairly dismissed and not paid notice pay, and the respondent failed to present a response.
Reference: 6032985/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: AG Coffee Shop Ltd
The respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and failed to pay accrued holiday pay, so both complaints were well-founded.
Reference: 2500560/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: AG Coffee Shop Ltd
The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded as the employer made an unauthorised deduction, but the holiday pay complaint was dismissed on withdrawal.
Reference: 2500563/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: AG Coffee Shop Ltd
The respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and failed to pay holiday pay owed on termination.
Reference: 2500562/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: AG Coffee Shop Ltd
The respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and failed to pay holiday pay due on termination.
Reference: 2500561/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
The claimant's complaints of direct discrimination and harassment based on race and disability failed and were dismissed.
Reference: 6002364/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: National Care Network Ltd
The claimant's claims of unfair dismissal, unpaid wages, unpaid holiday pay, and breach of contract were all well founded.
Reference: 6035221/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Utilita Field Services Ltd
The Tribunal found that the claim of automatically unfair dismissal under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well-founded.
Reference: 6008685/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: The Granary@T.V Ltd
The claims for unauthorised deductions, holiday pay, and unfair dismissal were upheld, but the claim for direct age discrimination was dismissed.
Reference: 6005072/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: AG Coffee Shop Ltd
The claim was dismissed because neither the claimant nor the respondent appeared at the hearing, leading to the Tribunal striking out the claim under Rule 47.
Reference: 2500566/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Cepac Ltd and Page Outsourcing UK Ltd
The claims were struck out because the claimant's conduct of the proceedings was found to be unreasonable, scandalous, and vexatious.
Reference: 6010960/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: AG Coffee Shop Ltd
The claim was dismissed because neither party attended the hearing, leading to a strike out under Rule 47.
Reference: 2500565/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.