Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Newcastle.
£104,825.86 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Humbledon and Plains Farm Workmen’s Club and Institute Ltd
The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed as out of time, but the statutory redundancy claim succeeded and the claimant was awarded £2,564.10.
Employer: Department for Work and Pensions
The claimant failed to attend the preliminary hearing and provided no explanation or engagement, leading to dismissal of all claims.
Employer: David Lloyd Leisure Ltd
The claimant failed to attend the hearing and did not engage with the tribunal, leading to dismissal of all claims under Rule 47.
Employer: Agelec Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) and Electrogenius Ltd
The tribunal found that the first claimant's notice pay and redundancy claims were not well-founded, but upheld the first claimant's annual leave claim and the second claimant's notice pay and redundancy claims, awarding damages and a redundancy payment.
Employer: G4S Facilities Management (UK) Ltd
The complaint of unfair dismissal was well founded.
Employer: Effective Security Services Ltd T/a Professional Security
The claimant won on unlawful deductions because rolled-up holiday pay was calculated on a below-minimum-wage basic rate, but lost all other claims because the cessation of shifts was due to an automatic right-to-work suspension, not a reaction to his complaints or disclosures.
Employer: Ground Control Ltd
The claim of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed.
Employer: Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
The claimant's claims for breach of contract, unfair dismissal, and unauthorised deductions were all upheld, with compensation awarded for each.
Employer: HSBC UK Bank plc
The claimant succeeded on one discrimination claim (failure to provide a printer) but failed on other discrimination and victimisation claims, and other claims were struck out.
Employer: Costain Ltd
All claims were either dismissed as not well founded or withdrawn by the claimant.
Employer: Carsa Ltd
The claim for unauthorised deduction of wages was not well-founded and was dismissed.
Employer: WORR Ltd
The claimant failed to prove any of his complaints (unfair dismissal, failure to make adjustments, discrimination arising from disability) were well-founded.
Employer: The Commissioners For HM’s Revenue and Customs
The claims of disability discrimination were not well-founded and were dismissed.
Employer: Ads Windows Ltd and Ace Windows (NE) Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation)
The claimant's statutory redundancy pay claim was within time and will proceed, but the unfair dismissal, breach of contract and unlawful deduction claims were dismissed as out of time.
Employer: EFTEC Ltd
Claimant was not dismissed and age discrimination and harassment claims were not well-founded.
Employer: The Council of the City of Newcastle upon Tyne
All claims were either struck out or dismissed as not well founded.
Employer: Notch Durham
The unfair dismissal claim was struck out for lack of qualifying service, but the wrongful dismissal, unauthorised deduction from wages (tips), and failure to provide written particulars claims all succeeded.
Employer: Security Defence Group Ltd
The claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages was well founded and the respondent was ordered to pay £230.
Employer: Sureserve Compliance North Ltd
Ms Forster succeeded on her direct sex discrimination claim regarding suspension and failure to take her complaint seriously, but all other claims by both claimants were dismissed.
Employer: Rosen (UK) Ltd
The claim was dismissed because it was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was reasonably practicable to do so.
Employer: M Harding and Mick Harding Ltd
The claimant was an employee of the second respondent, so the claim against the first respondent was dismissed; the second respondent made an unauthorised deduction of £150, so that claim succeeded.
Employer: Ms J Paterson (T/a Jacqui Paterson’s Veterinary Practice)
The respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and failed to pay accrued holiday pay.
Employer: National Care Network Franchising Ltd
All complaints were well-founded and the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant for notice pay, holiday pay, redundancy payment, and unauthorised deductions.
Employer: County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust
The Trust's policy requiring claimants to share a changing room with a biological male trans woman and its failure to address their concerns amounted to harassment and indirect sex discrimination, but other harassment allegations and victimisation claims were dismissed.
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.