Unfair Dismissal
Employer: Ladbrokes Betting and Gaming Ltd
The complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded, so the claim failed and was dismissed.
Reference: 6023099/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Liverpool.
£69,457.26 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Ladbrokes Betting and Gaming Ltd
The complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded, so the claim failed and was dismissed.
Reference: 6023099/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Marks and Spencer plc
All claims were struck out because the claimant failed to attend the hearing without explanation.
Reference: 2404433/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Stretford Swim School Ltd
The respondent breached the claimant's contract by failing to pay the full 4 weeks' contractual notice pay, and the claimant was awarded the outstanding 3 weeks' pay.
Reference: 6037159/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Parallel Security Ltd and 3RIO Group Ltd (in liquidation)
The claimant succeeded on all complaints: unauthorised deductions, holiday pay, and TUPE failure to inform/consult, with an ACAS uplift applied.
Reference: 2402230/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: The Commissioners for HM's Revenue and Customs
Both complaints were not well-founded and were dismissed.
Reference: 2407210/23 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Lawton Hotels Ltd and Others
The unfair dismissal claim was struck out because the claimant had less than two years' service, and the respondents' responses to the remaining claims were later struck out for failure to actively pursue them.
Reference: 2401371/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Graham Jones Associates Ltd
All claims were struck out because the claimant failed to attend the hearing without explanation.
Reference: 6019131/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Icon Group Services (in creditors voluntary liquidation)
The claimant succeeded on all claims: unfair dismissal, unauthorised deduction from wages, and breach of contract for notice pay.
Reference: 6005476/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: H Newton Hale & Sons Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation)
The respondent failed to elect employee representatives as required by section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, so the claimant's complaint under section 189 succeeded.
Reference: 6034662/25 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Widnes MOT Centre Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation)
The claimant was unfairly dismissed and his claims under sections 94, 98, and 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 were well-founded.
Reference: 2402919/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Mr D Eccleston
The claimant succeeded on some whistleblowing detriment claims against the first respondent and some sexual harassment claims against the second respondent, but failed on all other claims; a remedy hearing was ordered.
Reference: 2410971/2023 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Countess of Chester Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
The claimants succeeded on two specific detriment claims (interrogation on 15 Feb and removal of mortuary access on 16 Feb) but all other detriment complaints were dismissed.
Reference: 2403670/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Marks and Spencer plc
The claims for unfair dismissal and unauthorised wages were dismissed, but the claim for wrongful dismissal (notice pay) was upheld.
Reference: 6010676/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Mitie Group plc
The claimant's claims for breaches in the right to be accompanied at disciplinary hearings contrary to s10 Employment Relations Act 1999 failed and were dismissed.
Reference: 2400978/2025 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: The Brain Charity
The claimant succeeded only on one aspect of her reasonable adjustments claim (failure to give 24 hours' notice for disciplinary responses), but all other discrimination, harassment, and victimisation claims were dismissed.
Reference: 2400508/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: Manchester City Council
The Tribunal found that the respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments for the claimant's disabilities, as the compressed/reduced hours were not provided in a timely manner despite the claimant's requests and the respondent's knowledge of her conditions.
Reference: 2413674/2023 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Employer: The Carrbridge Centre Ltd
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim succeeded (liability only, remedy to be determined), but her claim for detriment for making a protected disclosure was dismissed.
Reference: 6015910/2024 (View detailed case summary — Pro Research)
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.